Three Benefits of a Literature Review
by D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye, University of Leeds
See: The impact of algorithmically driven recommendation systems on music consumption and production - a literature review by David Hesmondhalgh, Raquel Campos Valverde, D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye, and Zhongwei Li.
Writing a literature review is a fundamental element of any scholarly research project. While literature reviews generally precede a methods or discussion section, they are also invaluable resources in their own right to inform readers about a given topic. Earlier this year, my colleagues and I published a standalone literature review on the impacts of algorithmically driven recommendation systems on music consumption and production as part of a larger project investigating the impacts of digital streaming on music culture. Beyond the important role literature reviews serve in the broader research process, this short commentary reflects on three additional benefits we gained from writing our literature review, namely: doing rigorous interdisciplinary research; writing for non-academic audiences; and working together with new collaborators.
To begin, literature reviews bring concepts from different fields into dialogue. A literature review introduces the main theoretical frameworks and defines the key concepts that will be examined by the research. Often these theories and concepts draw from a range of different sources from various linked or unlinked fields of study. Writing an interdisciplinary literature review involves searching for possible points of overlap, identifying multiple different gaps, and unifying separate sets of ideas. The complexities of interdisciplinary research become more apparent the greater the distance between fields. Researchers are likely to find more similarities among literature from sociology and psychology, for example, than may exist between literature from computer science (CS), humanities, arts, and social science (HASS) as in the case of this review. All four authors of this review came from backgrounds in HASS, which created additional challenges to identify, interpret, and synthesize literature written by and for CS academics. To address potential blind spots and ensure the appropriate rigor, we sought feedback from colleagues with relevant CS expertise to review drafts and point us to any important material we might have missed. The final piece aims to offer a balanced review of concepts that are legible to readers regardless of scholarly background or professional expertise.
Next, writing a literature review helps researchers adjust to different audiences. Writing in concise and accessible language should be a goal for any literature review but it is even more crucial for academic works aimed toward non-academic readers. Our review was commissioned by the UK government as part of a larger ongoing inquiry into the economics of music streaming. Therefore, in addition to breaking down scientific concepts clearly for a lay-audience, the review needed to call attention to key issues and debates that are relevant to policymakers. Another consideration when working with a public funding body is how the path from submission to publication differs from more 'traditional' publication processes. Unlike a journal article or book chapter, there was no standard peer review for this piece. Without peer review, we needed to ensure we had thoroughly and sufficiently addressed important topics and debates in the literature before submitting our review. We are grateful for the feedback we received from outside experts, whom we acknowledge in our review.
Finally, writing a literature review as the first stage in a collaborative setting can help researchers build and develop team dynamics. Collaboration can be an enriching experience for researchers at all stages of their careers, and particularly for those who will be working together on a team. Our literature review was also the first opportunity for members of our research team to work together on a project. Through writing this review at the outset of our longer-term collaboration, we had the opportunity to get to know each other on an interpersonal and intellectual level, learned each other's working styles, and uncovered questions that would inform future collaborative works. Beyond the unique circumstances of our long-term collaboration, researchers working together on projects in any setting can benefit by dividing up labor to write a literature review as a way to gauge the shape of the collaboration to come.
Writing a literature review can feel daunting at first. Like any other piece of writing, the perfect, all-encompassing literature review does not exist. There will always be more books and articles to read and the elusive piece of extremely relevant literature that is only discovered after the review is finished or submitted. Following steps and guidelines, like those outlined elsewhere on SAGE MethodSpace, can equip researchers at all levels of experience with the tools needed to prepare systematic and robust reviews. Beyond the important role in the broader research context, literature reviews help researchers to navigate across disciplinary boundaries, write for non-academic audiences, and get to know one's collaborators.
Dr D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye (he/they) is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Leeds working on MUSICSTREAM (2022-2026). Kaye holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology with a minor in Music Performance (2014) and a Master of Science in Mass Communications (2016) from Kansas State University (USA). Kaye completed a PhD in Creative Industries in 2021 at Queensland University of Technology (Australia). Kaye’s doctoral research examines music creators and copyright law in Myanmar, interrogating the colonial legacy and power dynamics of copyright in informal media industries. Kaye is the author of TikTok: Creativity and Culture in Short Video (2022, co-written with Jing Zeng and Patrik Wikström), the first scholarly monograph on TikTok published by Polity Press. Kaye has published eleven peer-reviewed journal articles on topics including short video platforms and patriotism in China, media censorship in India, and copyright enforcement on YouTube. From 2014-2019, Kaye was the drummer, bassist, and co-songwriter for the band Parallel Path.
More Methodspace posts about literature reviews
Watch this recent webinar on Research Impact. Dr Tamika Heiden and Dr Josh Gladden discuss how they have encountered and promoted research impact within their fields, focusing on strategies for bridging academic and societal impact.
Gorilla has announced the opening of applications for their 2024 Multiplayer Grant, reflecting on the success of the Spring Grant. Winning projects showcased Gorilla’s tools, driving forward psychological and behavioral research.
In the fourth post of our Using Codebooks in Qualitative Research series, authors, Angie Sibley-White & Gisela Oliveira (Senior Lecturers in Education at De Montfort University), explore how codebooks benefit solo researchers. Beyond team projects, codebooks enhance research rigor, facilitate reflexivity, and support early theorization, making them invaluable tools for independent qualitative researchers.
In the third post of our Using Codebooks in Qualitative Research series, Angie Sibley-White (Senior Lecturer in Education at De Montfort University), reflects on her experience using a codebook during her PhD research. She shares insights on how a codebook can help novice researchers navigate complex data analysis, ensuring rigor, transparency, and consistency.
Introducing the Teaching category winner for the 2024 Concept Grants from Sage: The Media Education Research Lab (MERL) at UC Berkeley develops tools and methods to teach students how to critically assess diversity in film and television, promoting media literacy and nuanced analysis.
Introducing the Doing Research category winner for the 2024 Concept Grants from Sage: Y: The Home of LLMs is a versatile digital twin platform that simulates social media dynamics using LLMs, allowing researchers to explore and test social scenarios with realistic, customizable synthetic data.
Introducing the Learning category winner for the 2024 Concept Grants from Sage: educate_R suite simplifies advanced data analysis for social science students and researchers, offering intuitive tools like Data Distillery for data cleaning and visualization.
In the second post of our Using Codebooks in Qualitative Research series, our authors, Angie Sibley-White & Gisela Oliveira (Senior Lecturers in Education at De Montfort University), dive into the process of creating a codebook. We guide you through the essential steps, from defining your goals to developing and refining codes, ensuring consistency and clarity in your qualitative analysis.
Welcome to Using Codebooks in Qualitative Research. In the first post, our authors, Angie Sibley-White & Gisela Oliveira (Senior Lecturers in Education at De Montfort University) define codebooks, explore their flexibility, and discuss how they enhance data organization, consistency, and rigor in research.
Annotiva, a 2023 Sage Concept Grant recipient, gives an update on the development of their AI-assisted tool to enhance qualitative coding by predicting ambiguities and improving collaboration among novice researchers.
Catch up with Gorilla’s Shop Builder 2. Developed after receiving the 2023 Sage Concept Grant, it features a modular design, mobile compatibility, skinnability, and improved customization, enhancing researchers' flexibility and user experience.
BigKnowledge's BoKMap platform transforms mapping principles into a "GPS for knowledge," visualizing unstructured text data in a map-like form, aiding in document exploration and discovery across various domains. Read more for an update on ths 2023 Concept Grant winning project.
We check in with GailBot, the £15k Concept Grant winner. Combining ASR and ML to capture paralinguistic features, GailBot has been revamped for wider researcher use. After a week-long UCLA hack session, we’re addressing internationalization and user-driven feature requests, ensuring scalable and versatile transcription. Join our Slack Community for updates!
This blog by Nur Şat, Associate Professor at Hitit University, Türkiye discusses a project which bridged a critical gap in Public Administration (PA) research by offering a free, online training program on qualitative methods. Master's students and academics honed their skills in areas like proposal development and data analysis. The program attracted strong interest, with a mobile-friendly website garnering nearly 2,000 visits. Participants reported high satisfaction and a significant improvement in their research abilities. This experience offers valuable insights for academics seeking to organize similar projects.
Listen to this interview, and check out Rhys Jones’ latest book: Statistical Literacy: A Beginner's Guide.
Find examples and guidance about collecting data on blogs or vlogs.
Explore the significance of Juneteenth in US history and reflect on inclusive research practices with us! We highlight the role that researchers can play in designing research that is ethical, community based and transformative.
This blog post is the eighth, and final, post in a follow-on to our 2021 “The future of computational social science is Black” series, about a Summer Institute in Computational Social Science organized by Howard University and Mathematica. It continues to bring the power of computational social science to the issues of systemic racism and inequality in America. This marks the third iteration of the successful SICSS model being hosted by a Historically Black College or University.
While some types of online research use communication tools to interact with remote participants, digital methods use online approaches to study online phenomena.
This blog is the seventh, and penultimate post, in a follow-on to our 2021 “The future of computational social science is Black” series, about a Summer Institute in Computational Social Science organized by Howard University and Mathematica. It continues to bring the power of computational social science to the issues of systemic racism and inequality in America. This marks the third iteration of the successful SICSS model being hosted by a Historically Black College or University.
Dr. Stommel brings clarity to the messy world of data collection on social media.
This blog post is the sixth of eight in a follow-on to our 2021 “The future of computational social science is Black” series, about a Summer Institute in Computational Social Science organized by Howard University and Mathematica. It continues to bring the power of computational social science to the issues of systemic racism and inequality in America. This marks the third iteration of the successful SICSS model being hosted by a Historically Black College or University.
Latanya Sweeney, scholar of technology science, Daniel Paul Professor of the Practice of Government and Technology at the Harvard Kennedy School and in the Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences, and director and founder of the Public Interest Tech Lab, delivered the keynote address for SICSS-Howard/Mathematica 2023.
Do you have concerns about how to carry out data collection with vulnerable populations online? Find research strategies for reaching vulnerable people online.
This collection of open access articles offers multidisciplinary examples, guidance, and perspectives about online experimental research.
What are some of the issues researchers face, and what are the experiences of online participants? This collection of open-access articles includes diverse examples and perspectives.
This blog post is the fifth of eight in a follow-on to our 2021 “The future of computational social science is Black” series, about a Summer Institute in Computational Social Science organized by Howard University and Mathematica. It continues to bring the power of computational social science to the issues of systemic racism and inequality in America. This marks the third iteration of the successful SICSS model being hosted by a Historically Black College or University.
How do you know online participants are who they say they are? This collection of articles explores the issues - and solutions.
This blog post is the fourth of eight in a follow-on to our 2021 “The future of computational social science is Black” series, about a Summer Institute in Computational Social Science organized by Howard University and Mathematica. It continues to bring the power of computational social science to the issues of systemic racism and inequality in America. This marks the third iteration of the successful SICSS model being hosted by a Historically Black College or University.
Informed consent is the term given to the agreement between researcher and participant. In this post Janet Salmons offers suggestions about the intersections of the Internet communications, ethics and participants.